From the PubMed search to the manuscript, in one place.
Run and record your searches, screen titles and abstracts with your co-authors, collect the passages you will cite, and write the review with a reference list that keeps itself in order.
Free while LitRevs is in its early days. No card, no trial clock.
-
1
Search
Save the search strings, run them against PubMed with filters, keep every run.
-
2
Library
Results become the project's publications: deduplicated, labelled, annotated.
-
3
Screen
Title, abstract, full text. Reasons, counts and exports for the review.
-
4
Excerpt
Copy the passages you will build on, each tied to its paper.
-
5
Write
A manuscript with citations from the library and a reference list in your style.
Every search is on the record
Each run keeps its query, its filters, the date and every result. Run it again next month and see only what is new. The methods section writes itself from it.
Screening without the spreadsheet
Titles, then abstracts, then full text: accept, reject, give a reason. Who decided what is recorded, the counts are ready for the flow diagram, and the identifiers export to your reference manager.
Write together, cite from the library
Co-authors edit the same manuscript and see each other's changes. A citation points at a paper in the project; the reference list follows the style you pick. Export to Word, Markdown or LaTeX.
PubMed, up to the 9,999 results it returns
Publication types, dates, species, languages, age groups: the same filters PubMed offers, applied the same way. Other sources are planned; nothing is listed here until it works.
Honest limits
- PubMed shares a rate limit between everyone, so very large searches queue.
- Duplicates are matched by PMID, DOI and a title match you can adjust; nothing merges silently.
- Your data exports at any time. Deleting a project deletes everything in it.